I have long suspected this to be the case, but it wasn't until tonight that I realized there was a way to test it. Of course, these results are not conclusive, but I believe that, whatever they say, they speak for themselves. Of course, that I would even hypothesize about something like this just goes to show that I'm dragging around a lot of baggage.

about 717,000 English pages for "women's issues"
about 136,000 English pages for "men's issues"  

   there are over five times as many pages on "women's issues"

about 641,000 English pages for "women's issues" -"men's issues"
about  40,700 English pages for "men's issues" -"women's issues"

   there are over 15 times as many pages on "women's issues"
   excluding any mention of "men's issues" than there are pages
   on "men's issues" excluding any mention of "women's issues"

about 140,000 English pages for women -men baggage
about 239,000 English pages for men -women baggage

   there are 99,000 more pages that include the words "men" and
   "baggage" (with no reference to "women") than there are pages
   that include the words "women" and "baggage" (with no
   reference to "men")

about 7,590,000 English pages for women -men issues
about 6,440,000 English pages for men -women issues

   there are well over one million more pages that include the
   words "women" and "issues" (with no reference to "men") than
   there are pages that include the words "men" and "issues" (with
   no reference to "women")

man with baggage

woman with issues