elizabeth lane lawley
michael "OC" clarke
e v h e a d
sweet fancy moses
wood s lot
m. melting object
Tuesday, February 26, 2002
By "that link," John Dvorak is referring to the entry below, titled Stupid White Men, Part II. He writes:
"I'd advise readers to check out that link (if you can put up with juvenile cussing, etc.) it really shows the immature level of discourse. These folks will have the same negative impact on what I perceive as a positive phenomenom. Nobody wants to associate with what appears to be very creepy people who relish personal attack and personal insult and manic cussing. Not a positive influence on anything."How did it escape me that Dvorak in fact perceives blogging "as a positive phenomenon"? I guess I must have been skimming. And of course, his original article contained no personal insults -- such as suggesting that I must have been high on acid when I wrote that "cute mumbo jumbo" to the "ding-dongs" who signed the manifesto. "I imagine all these folks holding hands in a large circle, rolling back and forth, with some in the middle of the circle, spinning and chanting and hugging, all naked." I suppose that's not insulting, as he did refrain from cussing. I mean, he could have said we were "fucking naked." And that wouldn't have been a positive influence, now would it, class?
John, read my lips: you are an ignorant liar, a coward and a hypocrite. I'd add "a motherfucker," but I reserve that for people I respect.
What's truly funny here is that Dvorak doesn't seem to "get it" -- sorry, Charlie -- that I'm actually the author of the stuff he quoted in his piece-of-shit column. How detached from reality is this guy that he never heard of RageBoy? Heh.
2:18 PM | link |
"RageBoy: Giving being fucking nuts a good name since 1985."
egr on topica
on yahoo groups
terms of service
It is too late.
more / archives|
|live dangerously. subscribe to EGR|
at a major industry conference,
chris locke once again captures the real story.