Kat Herding![]() blogroll swan tinman humorlessbitch lindsay leslie si don williams jp rangaswami dan gillmor kevin marks ann craig musick frank paynter mary wehmeier donna wentworth gary turner halley suitt jeneane sessum blog sisters denise howell doc searls david weinberger brian millar steve larsen elizabeth lane lawley nanna michael "OC" clarke george partington e v h e a d megnut weblogs.com dave winer eric norlin tom matrullo gonzo-engaged akma sweet fancy moses julian bond steve maclaughlin stavros-twc the obvious? techwatch gayle noelle kate cohen wood s lot talking moose oliver willis dean landsman arjlog creepy steve bob adams hernani dimantas gordon.coale martin jensen living code plasticboy walter thornton phil wolff steve rhodes bob adams gaspar torriero paul vincent sharon o'neill sheila perkins pluto krozabeeep movable type keith pelczarski punkey suodatin dot-coma keith perkins howard greenstein greg carter aron nopanen mrbread bret fausett m. melting object chars sylvain carle jimslog hypnagogica garett laugavitz |
Thursday, February 28, 2002 More double talk from Dvorak This is almost too rich. Don't try to read it all at once. It's that deep. First, we have a PC Mag forum posting from an individual identified as SAVEBYJ. His predicament is not unlike the correspondent who was trying to get ahold of some blue glowing moon crystals. The problem with the Internet is that it propagates the myth that all truth (with a capitol "T") is relative. It's another way of saying that you "absolutely believe there are no absolutes". The Internet allows foolishness like the "ClueTrain Manifesto" to establish itself as Truth with no vigorous debate (of which it would not survive).Myself, I usually try to steer clear of such thorny philosophical dilemmas. Sometimes I'll simply ask whether the sender is keeping up with his meds. But John Dvorak is not one to brush off an earnest seeker. He replies... "I'm guessing that during times of change and uncertainty people need something to grasp onto that appears to explain the situation and promises to makes sense of it. Once someone subscribes to the new commonplaces, it's easier to keep these beliefs than discard them for no good reason until massive change happens again. This mechanism can be seen throughout history in various political forms. Fascism and Communism comes to mind or even the emergence of the Moral Majority and lesser movements. There is always the element of group-think and a harsh rejection of critical analysis. Hence the cult-like phenomenon which I described."A rejection of critical analysis? Wow. Words fail me. It's almost as if GWB were ghosting this stuff. 11:00 PM | link | |
"RageBoy: Giving being fucking nuts a good name since 1985."
egr on topica on yahoo groups (way)back issues egr home terms of service ![]()
It is too late. TECHNORATI BLOGDEX |
|||||||
|
more / archives | |
| live dangerously. subscribe to EGR |
|
at a major industry conference, chris locke once again captures the real story. | |